Difference between revisions of "Talk:General ships table"
(→Empty Rows) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Yes, it was one of his example charts. I still like how it looks, regardless, and will keep it how it is now. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16:34, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | Yes, it was one of his example charts. I still like how it looks, regardless, and will keep it how it is now. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16:34, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
| − | Please leave mark's code alone rogue. As a precautionary note, try to avoid annoying me right now, I'm quite ill. --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] | + | Please leave mark's code alone rogue. As a precautionary note, try to avoid annoying me right now, I'm quite ill. --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] 16:42, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) |
Revision as of 22:42, 23 March 2005
@Miharu-
I won't touch your chart, don't touch this one =)
--Mark McDoogle 11:56, 18 Mar 2005 (CST)
Empty Rows
Roguelazer, please stop removeding the empty rows, I have them there for divisionary purposes, I understand that YOU feel they are unnessacary. If you continue to remove them I will continue to put them back in. Try to find something more constructive to do then knitpick other peoples coding. --Mark McDoogle 10:59, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
How about they look ugly as sin? I think that's a good reason. Code well and I won't nitpick it. --Roguelazer 15:33, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Since I got the coding idea from Lemming, take it up with him. I'm simply asking you not to remove it any more, your welcome to your opinion on how it looks. --Mark McDoogle 16:05, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
You mean Lemming's mistake in the Sandbox that he liked when I took it out? That coding idea? --Roguelazer 16:15, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Yes, it was one of his example charts. I still like how it looks, regardless, and will keep it how it is now. --Mark McDoogle 16:34, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Please leave mark's code alone rogue. As a precautionary note, try to avoid annoying me right now, I'm quite ill. --Lemming 16:42, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
