Talk:Ship class table: Difference between revisions

MarkMcDoogle (talk | contribs)
m Why the Attack/Assault section?
Lemming (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<br>
<br>
Ok, What is the difference between a "fighter" and an "Attack/Assault Craft"?? Not much if anything. So why create a second section for it. Then on top of that you have included a "cargo" variant in witht the assault crafts!!! That is completely wrong, whether or not the variant acts like an attack vessel it is categorized as a "cargo" ship so why mix it in with a bunch of overweight "fighters"???? --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 12:23, 21 Mar 2005 (CST)
Ok, What is the difference between a "fighter" and an "Attack/Assault Craft"?? Not much if anything. So why create a second section for it. Then on top of that you have included a "cargo" variant in witht the assault crafts!!! That is completely wrong, whether or not the variant acts like an attack vessel it is categorized as a "cargo" ship so why mix it in with a bunch of overweight "fighters"???? --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 12:23, 21 Mar 2005 (CST)
Since when is a centurion, vulture, or valkyrie a transport ship?
Return to "Ship class table" page.