Talk:GTS: Difference between revisions
MarkMcDoogle (talk | contribs) New GTS Pictograms? |
MarkMcDoogle (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In any case, being able to create more symbles, or at least submit to receive the correct symble combination, would be really a neat thing to have. | In any case, being able to create more symbles, or at least submit to receive the correct symble combination, would be really a neat thing to have. | ||
:[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 14:47, 1 Mar 2005 (CST) | :[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 14:47, 1 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
So, I figured I'd download and try out those fonts again, just to see, and I've gotten this error both times I've tried to load them.<br> | |||
http://www.holtgraphicarts.com/images_webjh/FontValidation_GTS_Fonts.png<br> | |||
I've gotten this for both fonts. Are there any mac versions available, or could someone convert them to mac format and post? | |||
--[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 13:10, 23 May 2005 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:10, 23 May 2005
There really needs to be a way for the GTA to be expandable. There are words that would make much better Pictograms then Phonetic. An example would be "Duel" right now I could either spell it out with the Phonetic Alphabet, but usually you don't see the phonetic purely by it's self, there is always a pictogram. So would I represent a duel as "Fight"-"Duel" where "fight" is picto and "Duel" is phonetic?
In any case, being able to create more symbles, or at least submit to receive the correct symble combination, would be really a neat thing to have.
- Mark McDoogle 14:47, 1 Mar 2005 (CST)
So, I figured I'd download and try out those fonts again, just to see, and I've gotten this error both times I've tried to load them.
http://www.holtgraphicarts.com/images_webjh/FontValidation_GTS_Fonts.png
I've gotten this for both fonts. Are there any mac versions available, or could someone convert them to mac format and post?
--Mark McDoogle 13:10, 23 May 2005 (CST)
