Talk:Ship class table

Why do you put obvius assault ships in with the "transports" and transports in the "Fighters", I don't understand what you are doing Miharu?? --Mark McDoogle 12:05, 18 Mar 2005 (CST)

And in referrance to your conversation in IRC, I have no recelection of any conversation regarding that page, and if you read at the bottom of the edit windows, it says quite clear "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here." so quit getting your panties in a ruffle!! --Mark McDoogle 12:09, 18 Mar 2005 (CST)

Ok, What is the difference between a "fighter" and an "Attack/Assault Craft"?? Not much if anything. So why create a second section for it. Then on top of that you have included a "cargo" variant in witht the assault crafts!!! That is completely wrong, whether or not the variant acts like an attack vessel it is categorized as a "cargo" ship so why mix it in with a bunch of overweight "fighters"???? --Mark McDoogle 12:23, 21 Mar 2005 (CST)

Since when is a centurion, vulture, or valkyrie a transport ship? --Lemming

Well, I would not consider their primary purpose as a transport, but, there are cargo variants that Guild has made and they should be listed with the transports. They are good for "Special Deliveries" and such, or someone who wants the look while still having some cargo capacity, mind you not much. --Mark McDoogle 13:33, 21 Mar 2005 (CST)

I've added a suggestion to delete this page to the Main Editors Page. See that page for discussion.

Why the inneficient and outdated layout?

Why can't we just put all ships under the same table? The categories are broken anyway. Honestly, since when has a prometheus's main purpose been a bomber?!? Sure that's what the game info says, but let's be honest here.

Permission requested to remove outdated ship categories...