Difference between revisions of "Talk:GTS"
MarkMcDoogle (Talk | contribs) (New GTS Pictograms?) |
MarkMcDoogle (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In any case, being able to create more symbles, or at least submit to receive the correct symble combination, would be really a neat thing to have. | In any case, being able to create more symbles, or at least submit to receive the correct symble combination, would be really a neat thing to have. | ||
:[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 14:47, 1 Mar 2005 (CST) | :[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 14:47, 1 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | So, I figured I'd download and try out those fonts again, just to see, and I've gotten this error both times I've tried to load them.<br> | ||
| + | http://www.holtgraphicarts.com/images_webjh/FontValidation_GTS_Fonts.png<br> | ||
| + | I've gotten this for both fonts. Are there any mac versions available, or could someone convert them to mac format and post? | ||
Revision as of 19:09, 23 May 2005
There really needs to be a way for the GTA to be expandable. There are words that would make much better Pictograms then Phonetic. An example would be "Duel" right now I could either spell it out with the Phonetic Alphabet, but usually you don't see the phonetic purely by it's self, there is always a pictogram. So would I represent a duel as "Fight"-"Duel" where "fight" is picto and "Duel" is phonetic?
In any case, being able to create more symbles, or at least submit to receive the correct symble combination, would be really a neat thing to have.
- Mark McDoogle 14:47, 1 Mar 2005 (CST)
So, I figured I'd download and try out those fonts again, just to see, and I've gotten this error both times I've tried to load them.
http://www.holtgraphicarts.com/images_webjh/FontValidation_GTS_Fonts.png
I've gotten this for both fonts. Are there any mac versions available, or could someone convert them to mac format and post?
