Changes

Talk:General ships table

1,246 bytes added, 23:42, 1 July 2007
Roguelazer, please stop removeding the empty rows, I have them there for divisionary purposes, I understand that YOU feel they are unnessacary. If you continue to remove them I will continue to put them back in. Try to find something more constructive to do then knitpick other peoples coding. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 10:59, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
How about they look ugly as sin? I think that's a good reason. Code well and I won't nitpick it. --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 15:33, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Since I got the coding idea from Lemming, take it up with him. I'm simply asking you not to remove it any more, your welcome to your opinion on how it looks. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16:05, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
How about they look ugly as sinYou mean Lemming's mistake in the Sandbox that he liked when I took it out? That coding idea? --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 16:15, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) Yes, it was one of his example charts. I think thatstill like how it looks, regardless, and will keep it how it is now. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16:34, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) Please leave mark's a good reasoncode alone rogue. Code well and As a precautionary note, try to avoid annoying me right now, I won't nitpick itm quite ill. --[[User:RoguelazerLemming|RoguelazerLemming]] 1516:3342, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) == Ship Thrust Force ==I'm pretty sure all the Ship Thrust stats are quoted 1000 times too small. When you fly a Warthog 2, it has a thrust force of 210 kN, not 210 N, as it's weight is 5700kg not 5700g (do the math on Newton's equations of motion and you'll see what I mean). Sad thing is, they're actually all quoted wrong in the VO client as well. They should be relabled (in the VO client also) as kN, not N. A Newton is a very small force to move a ship. [[User:Foo Fighter|Foo Fighter]] 19:42, 1 July 2007 (EDT) Foo Fighter
184
edits