Talk:Trade Goods by Class of Goods: Difference between revisions
MarkMcDoogle (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Roguelazer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(18 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'Creature comforts'?? How about 'Commercial Goods'? | |||
--[[User:Phaserlight|Phaserlight]] 12:02, 12 May 2006 (EDT) | |||
---- | |||
I really don't like those back links... If we need to have 'em, could we at least limit it to one at the bottom rather than one every few lines interrupting the readabiliy ofthe page? --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 20:19, 4 Mar 2005 (CST) | I really don't like those back links... If we need to have 'em, could we at least limit it to one at the bottom rather than one every few lines interrupting the readabiliy ofthe page? --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 20:19, 4 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 4: | Line 7: | ||
--[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 23:56, 4 Mar 2005 (CST) | --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 23:56, 4 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
---- | |||
---- | |||
Oy, I have made a different table for organization of the trade goods, it can be found at the bottom of the [[sandbox]]. Right now it seems that the current one offers easier to edit data, while the other one (in my opinion) looks nicer. --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] | |||
== Trade goods XP == | |||
Can you add a table listing the XP gained per widget when selling? --RelayeR | |||
I thought I added that column in a month ago, though I didn't add the xp values, though they all seem to be 3xp per widget. Hopefully with the new econ update (3 years from now) they will make some widgets more advantagous then others, like 3cu widgets are 6xp while a 1cu widget is only 3, etc. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 12:31, 5 January 2006 (EST) | |||
There you go RelayeR :D --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 12:42, 5 January 2006 (EST) | |||
xp values may not be 100% accurate anymore. will check that later --[[User:Mr spuck|Mr spuck]] 22:16, 10 August 2006 (EDT) | |||
== RFC: Page removal == | |||
Now that we have sortable tables and such, this page seems unnecessary. I think we should make the main list (in [[Trading]]) sortable and break it out into its own page ([[Trade Goods]], perhaps), then delete this page. Thoughts? --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 23:27, 27 November 2007 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 04:27, 28 November 2007
'Creature comforts'?? How about 'Commercial Goods'? --Phaserlight 12:02, 12 May 2006 (EDT)
I really don't like those back links... If we need to have 'em, could we at least limit it to one at the bottom rather than one every few lines interrupting the readabiliy ofthe page? --Roguelazer 20:19, 4 Mar 2005 (CST)
Happy
--Mark McDoogle 23:56, 4 Mar 2005 (CST)
Oy, I have made a different table for organization of the trade goods, it can be found at the bottom of the sandbox. Right now it seems that the current one offers easier to edit data, while the other one (in my opinion) looks nicer. --Lemming
Trade goods XP
Can you add a table listing the XP gained per widget when selling? --RelayeR
I thought I added that column in a month ago, though I didn't add the xp values, though they all seem to be 3xp per widget. Hopefully with the new econ update (3 years from now) they will make some widgets more advantagous then others, like 3cu widgets are 6xp while a 1cu widget is only 3, etc. --Mark McDoogle 12:31, 5 January 2006 (EST)
There you go RelayeR :D --Mark McDoogle 12:42, 5 January 2006 (EST)
xp values may not be 100% accurate anymore. will check that later --Mr spuck 22:16, 10 August 2006 (EDT)
RFC: Page removal
Now that we have sortable tables and such, this page seems unnecessary. I think we should make the main list (in Trading) sortable and break it out into its own page (Trade Goods, perhaps), then delete this page. Thoughts? --Roguelazer 23:27, 27 November 2007 (EST)