Template talk:Ship Navbox: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

I think I'd prefer it if we didn't put these navboxes under a "See Also" heading. Just stick them at the bottom of the page; it's what wikipedia does, and I think it looks cleaner. Just my 2Â¢. --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 02:17, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

It's fine by me, if you don't feel like changing them I'll do it tomorrowish. --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] 02:42, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 06:17, 2 May 2008 view source17 years ago Roguelazer (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 1,721 edits New page: I think I'd prefer it if we didn't put these navboxes under a "See Also" heading. Just stick them at the bottom of the page; it's what wikipedia does, and I think it looks cleaner. Just my...		Latest revision as of 06:42, 2 May 2008 view source17 years ago Lemming (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators 1,110 edits No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think I'd prefer it if we didn't put these navboxes under a "See Also" heading. Just stick them at the bottom of the page; it's what wikipedia does, and I think it looks cleaner. Just my 2Â¢. --[[User:Roguelazer\|Roguelazer]] 02:17, 2 May 2008 (EDT)		I think I'd prefer it if we didn't put these navboxes under a "See Also" heading. Just stick them at the bottom of the page; it's what wikipedia does, and I think it looks cleaner. Just my 2Â¢. --[[User:Roguelazer\|Roguelazer]] 02:17, 2 May 2008 (EDT)

			It's fine by me, if you don't feel like changing them I'll do it tomorrowish. --[[User:Lemming\|Lemming]] 02:42, 2 May 2008 (EDT)