Talk:Who Bind: Difference between revisions
Roguelazer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Mostly because I already wrote it for VORuby and am way too lazy to cut out that code (especially since I wrote a custom tail() and abstraction classes, which add a lot of bulk). --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 23:08, 27 July 2006 (EDT) | Mostly because I already wrote it for VORuby and am way too lazy to cut out that code (especially since I wrote a custom tail() and abstraction classes, which add a lot of bulk). --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 23:08, 27 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
Great, then why the hell are you complaining about it? This is still faster & easier than installing ruby and compiling a custom tail from source, especially for those people who are running VO on Windows. This is just a tiny hack, nothing more, nothing less, and there is no custom tail neccesary. Complaining w/ giving any kind of suggestions is pointless, just as this discussion. -firsm |
Latest revision as of 08:23, 28 July 2006
Wow that's a lot of duplication. It can be done in a lot less lines than that, you know...
Well the bad thing is that bash does not support floats, formatting the website into a comma-seperated list is pretty much everything the script is about. The second reason this script is so long is the character limit on vendetta's "echo" command. Effectively (w/ comments, global variables and cases), this script is just 30 lines. But why don't you rewrite it? -firsm
Mostly because I already wrote it for VORuby and am way too lazy to cut out that code (especially since I wrote a custom tail() and abstraction classes, which add a lot of bulk). --Roguelazer 23:08, 27 July 2006 (EDT)
Great, then why the hell are you complaining about it? This is still faster & easier than installing ruby and compiling a custom tail from source, especially for those people who are running VO on Windows. This is just a tiny hack, nothing more, nothing less, and there is no custom tail neccesary. Complaining w/ giving any kind of suggestions is pointless, just as this discussion. -firsm