Talk:General ships table: Difference between revisions
Roguelazer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Foo Fighter (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
How about they look ugly as sin? I think that's a good reason. Code well and I won't nitpick it. --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 15:33, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | How about they look ugly as sin? I think that's a good reason. Code well and I won't nitpick it. --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 15:33, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | ||
Since I got the coding idea from Lemming, take it up with him. I'm simply asking you not to remove it any more, your welcome to your opinion on how it looks. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16:05, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | |||
You mean Lemming's mistake in the Sandbox that he liked when I took it out? That coding idea? --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 16:15, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | |||
Yes, it was one of his example charts. I still like how it looks, regardless, and will keep it how it is now. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16:34, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | |||
Please leave mark's code alone rogue. As a precautionary note, try to avoid annoying me right now, I'm quite ill. --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] 16:42, 23 Mar 2005 (CST) | |||
== Ship Thrust Force == | |||
I'm pretty sure all the Ship Thrust stats are quoted 1000 times too small. When you fly a Warthog 2, it has a thrust force of 210 kN, not 210 N, as it's weight is 5700kg not 5700g (do the math on Newton's equations of motion and you'll see what I mean). Sad thing is, they're actually all quoted wrong in the VO client as well. They should be relabled (in the VO client also) as kN, not N. A Newton is a very small force to move a ship. [[User:Foo Fighter|Foo Fighter]] 19:42, 1 July 2007 (EDT) Foo Fighter | |||
Latest revision as of 23:42, 1 July 2007
@Miharu-
I won't touch your chart, don't touch this one =)
--Mark McDoogle 11:56, 18 Mar 2005 (CST)
Empty Rows
Roguelazer, please stop removeding the empty rows, I have them there for divisionary purposes, I understand that YOU feel they are unnessacary. If you continue to remove them I will continue to put them back in. Try to find something more constructive to do then knitpick other peoples coding. --Mark McDoogle 10:59, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
How about they look ugly as sin? I think that's a good reason. Code well and I won't nitpick it. --Roguelazer 15:33, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Since I got the coding idea from Lemming, take it up with him. I'm simply asking you not to remove it any more, your welcome to your opinion on how it looks. --Mark McDoogle 16:05, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
You mean Lemming's mistake in the Sandbox that he liked when I took it out? That coding idea? --Roguelazer 16:15, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Yes, it was one of his example charts. I still like how it looks, regardless, and will keep it how it is now. --Mark McDoogle 16:34, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Please leave mark's code alone rogue. As a precautionary note, try to avoid annoying me right now, I'm quite ill. --Lemming 16:42, 23 Mar 2005 (CST)
Ship Thrust Force
I'm pretty sure all the Ship Thrust stats are quoted 1000 times too small. When you fly a Warthog 2, it has a thrust force of 210 kN, not 210 N, as it's weight is 5700kg not 5700g (do the math on Newton's equations of motion and you'll see what I mean). Sad thing is, they're actually all quoted wrong in the VO client as well. They should be relabled (in the VO client also) as kN, not N. A Newton is a very small force to move a ship. Foo Fighter 19:42, 1 July 2007 (EDT) Foo Fighter
