Talk:Weapons:Table: Difference between revisions
MarkMcDoogle (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Phaserlight (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
these tables would be so much more useful if you could click on one of the colum titles and have it sort by that data. As it is now it's just alphabetical. I'm sure it's a lot of programing to get it to do that, but if anyone knows how it would be really cool to have it do that. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 10:58, 26 Apr 2005 (CST) | these tables would be so much more useful if you could click on one of the colum titles and have it sort by that data. As it is now it's just alphabetical. I'm sure it's a lot of programing to get it to do that, but if anyone knows how it would be really cool to have it do that. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 10:58, 26 Apr 2005 (CST) | ||
It's doable, but it would probably make updating the wiki impossible until I (or whoever did it) hacked up the source of the new version to support the same feature. It couldn't really be a module, but would have to be built-in. --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] | |||
Something for the long term goal list then I guess =) --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 12:38, 26 Apr 2005 (CST) | |||
Perhaps this is unimportant, but does it make sense to divide weapons by "energy" and "conventional"? As I recall the devs categorized weapons in five groups: energy, projectile, missile, rocket, and mine. I guess the word "conventional" just seems a little strange to me... | |||
--[[User:Phaserlight|Phaserlight]] 15:21, 23 June 2006 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:21, 23 June 2006
these tables would be so much more useful if you could click on one of the colum titles and have it sort by that data. As it is now it's just alphabetical. I'm sure it's a lot of programing to get it to do that, but if anyone knows how it would be really cool to have it do that. --Mark McDoogle 10:58, 26 Apr 2005 (CST)
It's doable, but it would probably make updating the wiki impossible until I (or whoever did it) hacked up the source of the new version to support the same feature. It couldn't really be a module, but would have to be built-in. --Roguelazer
Something for the long term goal list then I guess =) --Mark McDoogle 12:38, 26 Apr 2005 (CST)
Perhaps this is unimportant, but does it make sense to divide weapons by "energy" and "conventional"? As I recall the devs categorized weapons in five groups: energy, projectile, missile, rocket, and mine. I guess the word "conventional" just seems a little strange to me... --Phaserlight 15:21, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
