Talk:ChangeLog
Beolach 22:51, 1 Mar 2005 (CST): Here's the ChangeLog I've maintained since 1.1.0. I've stripped out the "Known Issues" from each version, as IMO past "Known Issues" aren't very interesting, but actual changes are. Also, I could see leaving old known issues in possibly being confusing.
Would it be possible to in the future list the date that the game is updated? --Mark McDoogle 10:05, 15 Mar 2005 (CST)
-- Well, we could, but I'd actually rather not, because much as I regret it now, I didn't keep track of when the previous patches were released, so unless the devs or someone who did keep track tells us, we can't add it to the previous versions. And, assuming we the players keep this page up-to-date (a safe assumption, I think), we can see on the history page when the new changes were made. Just my opinion though. -- Beolach 14:23, 15 Mar 2005 (CST)
Didn't say anything about previous updates, but from now on, when it's added just add a date tag to the first line. Would be nice to see, and not everyone is going to look at the recently modified list to find it out. --Mark McDoogle 14:45, 15 Mar 2005 (CST)
I'd prefer to keep it consistant. Ideally that would mean putting date-released info with all versions, including past ones, but as that's not possible I'd prefer to keep it consistant, without adding new info to new updates. Just my opinion though. -- Beolach 19:34, 15 Mar 2005 (CST)
Argh
Help !
The changelog looks kinda borked..
Missing text
Am I crazy, or is a lot of text missing from 1.1.5 down? It looks like roguelazer's edit clipped it for some reason. --Lemming 16:59, 13 June 2006 (EDT)
Page split discussion
It might be time for us to think about splitting this page. When 2.0 comes out, we might want to archive everything from 1.x. We might even want to archive everything from pre-1.5 now. Create "ChangeLog/Archive" (subpages are fun) and put the old stuff there, maybe? --Roguelazer 18:30, 13 June 2006 (EDT)
Perhaps call it something like "Changelog (1.1.1 to 1.x)" for when we need to do this again. The topic of page size on wikipedia is here. It sounds like it was either a fluke, or you used an older browser. --Lemming 14:24, 15 June 2006 (EDT)
And now we've hit the 32KB maximum suggested page size. My thoughts:
- "ChangeLog]" - for the current release tree
- "ChangeLog/1" - For 1.0 through 1.2.6
- "ChangeLog/1.5" - For 1.5 through 1.9.whatever (once 2.0 is released)
- "ChangeLog/2" - For 2.x until the next major revision (be it 2.5 or 3.0)
--Roguelazer 00:10, 18 July 2006 (EDT)
I was gonna suggest:
- "ChangeLogOld" for pre 1.5
- "ChangeLog1.5" for 1.5.x
- "ChangeLog1.6" for 1.6.x
- make ChangeLog a redirect to "ChangeLog1.6" for now, and to "ChangeLog1.7" or whatever the next one is when that comes out.
--Stridervc 04:53, 19 August 2006 (EDT)
Subpages > Suffixes. :-) Otherwise, sounds good. Wait for some more input, though. --Roguelazer 00:32, 20 August 2006 (EDT)
Barring any further complaints, I'm going to make the split now, k? --Roguelazer 01:41, 23 November 2006 (EST)