Changes
From Vendetta Online Wiki
/* Suggestions Place */
** I'm shocked, SHOCKED, to say this but, that is exactly what I had in mind in the first place rogue, if only [[User:Lemming|Lem]][[User:Miharu|Haru]] would agree to it. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16:17, 30 Jun 2005 (CST)
**Pretty late at night over here, so I'll think it all through tomorrow morning. But, if I get the gist of it, sounds good. If you need to get my opinion on something you can either [mailto:ninjashark@gmail.com e-mail] me or use memoserv on IRC to leave me a message, either way I'll get it. (e-mail is more likely to get noticed sooner though) Also, in case you care, editor pages are on my list of things to redo.
**So as far as categories go, we're pretty much there I guess now, but I have one small request. I really don't see the VO backstory as "misc. info", it's very important info. IMO, and should be both linked in and categorized as General Information. Other then that for the moment I think everything looks good. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 6 July 2005 16:13 (CST)----* [[Ship class table]]: In my opinion, this table is:**completely redundant (compared to the [[General ships table]])**usually out of date (a third place to fix stats!)**pretty much useless (does anyone really look at this table and say "I want a medium fighter -- oh look! I'll use an Atlas MkIII!")I know I'm sticking my neck out here, but I just wanted to start a discussion instead of deleting it on a whim. (Of course, if I don't get any feedback, I'll probably delete it.) --[[User:Klox|Klox]] November 11, 2005 03:15 (CST)* I'm actually gonna agree with you. We could stand to do some trimming of excess... --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 2005-11-12 17:01:31 (CST)* I actually do look at it but I agree that it's yet another place to update, it would be nice if the info was able to be entered once and update all over, or have a way to sort charts but wiki is not that hip yet. If it must be deleted fine but I do use it. And it does have it's place. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 14 November 2005 23:59 (CST)* I agree and vote to axe it. --[[User:LostCommander|LostCommander]] 16 November 2005 9:53 (CST)* Mark, are there ways you use the Ship class table that can't be done with the General ships table? (Maybe there's something we can do with the General table to serve that purpose?) --[[User:Klox|Klox]] November 19, 2005 03:34 (CST)* I'll restate them, but they can not be done easily. Make the charts into databases that can be sorted by there particular column. This way if you are looking for a "cargo" varient vs a "assault" varient it's easier to see. But again, this would take a lot of work to do, and I'm not sure if it's at all possible in a wiki enviornment. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 15:42, 5 December 2005 (CST)** As I've said before, it could be done. Just not easily. Hell of an extension, that would be. --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 21:02, 5 December 2005 (CST)----I spent some time wandering through some of the special pages, and this is what I found:* Category:Deprecated** [[Test]] - This serves no purpose. It should be deleted.** Other than [[Test]], the only other deprecated page is [[Bots:Frigate]], which contains very little content. Can't any "historical" information be merged with the HAC page? Then the Deprecated category won't be necessary.* [[Special:Wantedpages]] - see bugs section below.* [[Current events]] seems more out of date than ever. I've made my case for it's deletion in [[Talk:Current events]].* [[Special:Uncategorizedpages]]:** [[CWTOM]] appears to be a work of fiction.** [[Capitalships]] and [[Capitalships history]] are useless.** [[Capital ships]], while mostly correct, doesn't seem necessary. It seems like the description should be moved the the [[Ships#Capital_Ships]] section, where it will be seen and can act as an introduction to Cap Ships. (Currently you have to click on a specific cap ship to find a link to the general description -- isn't that backwards?)** [[Misc:dock]] seems like there is nothing similar to it. Maybe it's contents should be moved into the FAQ, which talks about docs anyway?And again, I know I'm probably ruffling someone's feathers with some of these comments, but I'm just looking to start a discussion. If I'm shot down, so be it. --[[User:Klox|Klox]] November 19, 2005 05:12 (CST) Hmm, no opinions? I'd love to at least clean up some of the more benign issues, but I'm not a sysop so I can't delete. Are there any sysops that want to help me with this cleanup, or better yet, does Lemming want to make me a sysop so I don't need to bug other sysops? --[[User:Klox|Klox]] 23:35, 3 December 2005 (CST)** Mark pages for deletion in their Discussion and I'll take care of it. If I agree with you. But I don't entirely.*** [[CWTOM]] and [[Capital ships]] can't be deleted. Apparently, there's a lot of offline content for those that needs toe be updated sometime.*** [[Test]] is for memoribilia's sake. Ditto for [[Bots:Frigate]]. That page isn't actually about a HAC, just something that looks like one... Hmm...well... [[Test]], [[Bots:Frigate]], and everything associated with [[CWTOM]] is the bulk of my list. So I guess that means we'll just leave them alone. I don't really understand your reasons for keeping them, but I don't care to argue the point. As I said in my initial post, "so be it". --[[User:Klox|Klox]] 23:13, 12 December 2005 (EST)muc
=== Bugs ===
