Talk:TPG Teradon Frigate: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
comment |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Your *text* additions were grammatically incorrect. Those are what I fixed. :[[User:Miharu|Miharu]] 15:17, 19 May 2006 (EDT) | Your *text* additions were grammatically incorrect. Those are what I fixed. :[[User:Miharu|Miharu]] 15:17, 19 May 2006 (EDT) | ||
You didn't fix my text addition, you reverted all of my additions, including adding the old tag, and then brought my new pictures back in your own edit, which is labeled "Rolled back--new version was grammatically incorrect; the previous was not." Since the only change in this edit was to bring back the new pictures, I assumed the old pic must have been "grammatically incorrect." Also, for future edits, what was grammatically incorrect about my changes and why is this article now fully up-to-date? --[[User:Pixelcat|Pixelcat]] 23:20, 20 May 2006 (EDT) |
Revision as of 03:20, 21 May 2006
I'm curious now, User:Miharu says the old picture was grammatically incorrect, yet now the page is inconsistent, it shows ship in game that "Virtually nothing is known about." I hope somebody can fix that and give specific details on how the vessel is equiped, especially since we now know more about this vessel. --Pixelcat 10:13, 19 May 2006 (EDT)
Your *text* additions were grammatically incorrect. Those are what I fixed. :Miharu 15:17, 19 May 2006 (EDT)
You didn't fix my text addition, you reverted all of my additions, including adding the old tag, and then brought my new pictures back in your own edit, which is labeled "Rolled back--new version was grammatically incorrect; the previous was not." Since the only change in this edit was to bring back the new pictures, I assumed the old pic must have been "grammatically incorrect." Also, for future edits, what was grammatically incorrect about my changes and why is this article now fully up-to-date? --Pixelcat 23:20, 20 May 2006 (EDT)