Talk:Capital ships: Difference between revisions
Roguelazer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Roguelazer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Maybe, but not yet, what I ment was that this description would best be placed under the Cap Ship header on the [[ships]] page, rather then make an empty page just for it, and that is not linked to any other pages. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16 September 2005 23:15 (CST) | Maybe, but not yet, what I ment was that this description would best be placed under the Cap Ship header on the [[ships]] page, rather then make an empty page just for it, and that is not linked to any other pages. --[[User:MarkMcDoogle|Mark McDoogle]] 16 September 2005 23:15 (CST) | ||
Hmm. I just noticed that we have an infinite-loop of links. Check out | Hmm. I just noticed that we have an infinite-loop of links. Check out [[Special:Whatlinkshere/Capital_ships]] . [[Heavy Assault Cruiser]] links [[Capital ships|here]], and here links (only) to [[Heavy Assault Cruiser]]. Funky! --[[User:Roguelazer|Roguelazer]] 2005-09-17 00:40:47 (CST) | ||
Revision as of 00:41, 17 September 2005
What is this page for? We already have a section in ships for Capital Ships, any description of a Capital Ship should go there shouldn't it?? --Mark McDoogle 16 September 2005 15:40 (CST)
I thought Miharu was going to put all the CTOWAMMY (or whatever the tactical guide) was called stuff here?
Maybe, but not yet, what I ment was that this description would best be placed under the Cap Ship header on the ships page, rather then make an empty page just for it, and that is not linked to any other pages. --Mark McDoogle 16 September 2005 23:15 (CST)
Hmm. I just noticed that we have an infinite-loop of links. Check out Special:Whatlinkshere/Capital_ships . Heavy Assault Cruiser links here, and here links (only) to Heavy Assault Cruiser. Funky! --Roguelazer 2005-09-17 00:40:47 (CST)
